First, f. called me a criminal, of said I was part of a criminal enterprise. Second, he does not say anything, because his posts are incoherent, repetitive rambles -- as opposed to yours, which are well writtten, even though I disagree with them. I have asked him politely, on a number of occasions, to put his thoughts into sentences and paragraphs.
e.e. cummings was an interesting poet, but he was unique. The rest of us get no points for typographical explosions.
Everybody has their style. If one does not like how someone writes, one does read it. There are many so called 'great' authors which I find infinitely boring and would not bother with. I do not call them crazy though just because I do not like their style. As to his not making sense, well let me just say this, he is against evolution and those who like evolution do not like his posts. Seems to me they understand pretty well what he is saying.