Replies

"Every election now, will be settled not by the voters, but by some judge or another."

Highly doubtful. And no, while we are on it, the sky is not falling either.

I gotta ask: What did you expect from a democrat state? A liberal court and a democrat governor?

Isn't their general disdain for the rule of law, pretty much what separates US from THEM anyway... RATS eat cheese, not because they choose to but because it is the inner law of their nature. Democrats fudge the law because that is their internal belief system.

We can win this... our way. That is the nature of true conservatism... founding father's type of courage... not the sissyfied, pantywaisted hand-wringing "woe is us" stuff of late.

I cannot imagine my forebears at Concorde, getting all wilty at a court order to surrender their arms by some torie judicial pukemaster. It's time to press on and fix the "bayonets" for close in wet work, politically speaking... not this whiney... "WE WAS ROBBED" mentality.

Do you wanna lose this election? KEEP THE WHINING UP!

So What!?!? It was a bad call, but hardly the downfall of the republic. CONSERVATIVES, stop panicking. Vote harder. Support with our DOLLARS the candidates of choice and expect right to prevail at the ballot box where WE DEFINITELY have the FINAL say, instead of bemoaning the liberal justice system, where you cannot vote at all. We win the day in Jersey in November... and we will go a long way towards altering the liberal judicial branch for good.

It is possible and likely we will win... and not just in New Jersey either.

This defeatism will pass. And when Forrester wins anyway... which he surely can, it will be quite a slap to the NJSC... better than the supreme court could ever do...

Making McGreevey sweat is fun. Make them work hard to cheat even more... they might even get busted in the chops in a manner not foreseen at this time...

Doors swing both ways... especially the doors to "pandora's box" events.
rofl

I hope you're right. It would have been nice to have the other side forced to play by "the rules", but ultimately, we still have to win.

Regarding Forrester, about the only way I can see him sitting in the Senate on January 3 is if (a) he wins, (b) the Pubbies get a majority in the Senate AND (c) Trent Cave-A-Lott grows a backbone and resists the coming call from the DemonRATs to not seat him.

Its not whining, you are missing completely the point. But that's ok I am used to that here. The point is the rule of law in elections in particular is now meaningless... our Republic is indeed in a bad place.

its not a matter of the Republicans getting the decision their way next time, who's sitting on the bench should not be deciding elections, and that is clearly the path we are on... representative republic is nearing its end. Do not confuse observations with whining.

I am not whining that the Dems subverted the law, I am observing the rule of law is now null and void especially in the matter of elections. That is a horrible thing, and is larger than any one party.

I agree with a number of your comments. First, about the whining. I have friends with small children who, like most children, are prone to occasionally shout, "That's not fair!"

Their parents reply, "Don't be a Democrat."

Making McGreevey sweat is fun. Make them work hard to cheat even more... they might even get busted in the chops in a manner not foreseen at this time...

This part of your post I do not understand.