Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
The supreme court acted properly in refusing to become involved in what is a state issue. The problem is the New Jersey sumpreme court.
260 posted on 10/07/2002 11:52:15 AM PDT by Millionaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Millionaire
The supreme court acted properly in refusing to become involved in what is a state issue. The problem is the New Jersey sumpreme court.

It was easily thought that the election of a Federal Senator would fall under review for adherence to the Constitution:

Article One
Section. 4. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The federal perview also comes about under the Equal Protection provisions, although, not as comprehensively as it did in Florida...ergo the one sop here that allowed the wishy-washy to duck the issue.

No, I wouldn't have had a problem with their review, especially since the NJSC shouldn't have rewritten law reserved to their legislature in the first place.

297 posted on 10/07/2002 12:11:16 PM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson