Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
To defend yourself against an unknown, random, long range shooter, would be very difficult.

But to defend the next potential victim less so. Even if a suppressor is being used, or the gun is being fired from inside a vehicle, there is some firing signature. Especially at night, but also during the day. Puff of smoke, a "pop" or such as that. If an armed someone is in the right place to see or hear that, then the potential for stopping these guys goes up. If nothing else their vehicle gets "marked" (better yet diabled), and that would help the police find and apprehend or kill them.

1,958 posted on 10/07/2002 7:06:44 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Your best defence against a sniper is to keep moving.
1,962 posted on 10/07/2002 7:13:13 PM PDT by Lord Marshal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1958 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato
I would think defending the next potential victim would be even harder. An unknown shooting an unknown, how would that be easier? I guess if every person in the country was armed, and on the lookout 24/7, it would be possible, but I still don't see how you id an unknown, until after the fact.
2,030 posted on 10/08/2002 8:53:29 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1958 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson