Oh, brother, here we go again...
That's what you get learning your science in church, instead of from the source.
Start here to correct your misconceptions about "proof" in a scientific context.
Then proceed here to find not one, but 29 independent lines of evidence which confirm evolution to correct your erroneous belief that there are "no proofs" for evolution. You may not accept all of them, but it's childishly naive to flatly claim that there aren't any.
Finally, read this to correct the popular mistunderstanding of the word "theory" which you share.
Finally, in response to the original article, you'll find two very good rebuttals to Behe's claims here and here
Check them out, and learn something about a topic before you denounce it.
Jeremiah 5:21: Hear now this, O foolish people and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not
The evolutionists always trot out that garbage when caught in a spot. Funny though, they never wish to discuss any of those 29 evidences. In fact, way back when some of them were posted on FR, I easily disproved them 'with half my brain tied behind my back'. Each time they post this link I offer to discuss the one they think gives the strongest evidence, but they always decline. The article is what I call the usual evolutionist snow job. Keep throwing garbage to the wall to see if any of it sticks.
Well, since I know neither you nor any of your evo friends will have the courage to take up my challenge, I hereby give the readers an answer to the entire snow job: A Critique of Douglas Theobald's 29 Evidences for Macroevolution .