Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Saundra Duffy
Saundra, Dr Greer didn't say the two were equal, she merely equated the radical act of removing a part of the body (as a means to save the organism) with the act of removing an individual life in the womb (as a means to save the host organism). This war against abortion on demand is difficult enough without jumping into pits not intended. [Incidentally, I agree with Dr Greer that amputation is necessary as part of the physician's armamentarium for treating patients, as a last resort; I agree that there are very rare circumstances when aborting the life support for an individual human being in the womb is a lst resort ... and I think, if one reads Dr Greer accurately, she is arguing along similar lines.]
10 posted on 10/06/2002 1:15:27 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
a lst resort Wow! Make that read a LAST resort. I'm astonished at the reversal of the intended message merely by an 'a' not getting in the middle of the LST! Glad I read the post over, too late, but fianlly caught.
12 posted on 10/06/2002 1:18:58 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
...(as a means to save the host organism).

I know this is probably a correct statement. But, gee ... it makes the child sound like a parasite.

This war against abortion on demand is difficult enough without jumping into pits not intended.

See above.

An observation. Not a criticism.

18 posted on 10/06/2002 1:31:12 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson