I was responding to whatajoke who called Ready2go's list a collection of lies. When I asked R2G to provide a citation for the specific instance highlighted by waj he did.
The upshot was that Dr. Patterson DID say the things R2G claimed and it was not out of context therefore whatajoke's claim that they were lies is inaccurate.
How is that putting on blinders?
So if there's one quote in the whole list which is remotely defensible, all the lies which have been pointed out are allowed to stand as truth?
Creation "Science" is easy.