[balrog666]

So you would consider anyone who is a creationist like Dr. Raymond Jones of Australia who made multmillion dollar discoveries about the legume Leucana and bacterial symbiosis of grazing animals to be unqualified.

Yep, absolutely, outside of his specialty, he is as unqualified as anyone else. Furthermore, even within his specialty, if he was an activist or someone who proselytized on the job, he would fired in a New York minute. Seems pretty straightforward to me.

[lasereye]

Yep, absolutely, outside of his specialty, he is as unqualified as anyone else.

This is pretty meaningless, since I guess everyone is unqualified outside their specialty. Remember, this thread was about someone who couldn't get a letter of recommendation to go to Med school because he didn't believe in evolution. Evolution has no application in medicine that I know of. The evolutionists all seem to think this makes sense, since it indicates he lacks a "scientific mind". PatrickHenry compared it to someone who wants to study math who doesn't believe 2+2=4. So if this is true, no one who doesn't believe in evolution is qualified to be a scientist in any specialty. Therefore, I assume you wouldn't hire Raymond Jones in his specialty.

if he was an activist or someone who proselytized on the job, he would fired in a New York minute.

This has nothing to do with prosletyzing. It's about whether someone can be as competent a doctor or scientist if they don't believe in evolution as those who do.