[lasereye]

"a large amount of literature exists against the theory."

None of it science though. Which is sort of the point.

Since there are numerous scientists who dispute evolution theory, you obviously have no familiarity with any of the anti-evolution arguments. You remind me of a poster a few weeks back who asserted that evolutionists employed the scientific method in their analysis of fossils, which they don't. Turned out he didn't even know what the scientific method was.

[tjg]

Thanks for replying to my post.

Basically, the anti-evolution arguments dictate that because the process can not be shown to be linear, it can't be correct. Then they usually make the leap that it also refutes natural selection.

You may be right that evolution is totaly wrong, but people with your view usually are influenced by the belief that evolution and creation cannot coexist.

I just don't see where the two have anything to do with each other.