Replies

That's not what was said.

Maybe not directly, but as a consequence of lack of "falsifiability" it is not science. I was making a point. Any mention of the origins of life are not science due to the unfalsifiable nature of the subject.

I had not seen that page, thanks. It is very good in pointing out the possibilities that have been examined. Orgel admits difficulties I pointed out to jennyp long ago.

After years of trying, however, we have been unable to achieve the second step of replication - copying of a complementary strand to yield a duplicate of the first template - without help from protein enzymes. Equally disappointing, we can induce copying of the original template only when we run our experiments with nucleotides having a right-handed configuration. All nucleotides synthesized biologically today are right-handed. Yet on the primitive earth, equal numbers of right- and left-handed nucleotides would have been present. When we put equal numbers of both kinds of nucleotides in our reaction mixtures, copying was inhibited.

All these problems are worrisome, but they do not completely rule out the possibility that RNA was initially synthesized and replicated by relatively uncomplicated processes. Perhaps minerals did indeed catalyze both the synthesis of properly structured nucleotides and their polymerization to a random family of oligonucleotides. Then copying without replication would have produced a pair of complementary strands. If, as Szostak has posited, one of the strands happened to be a ribozyme that could copy its complement and thus duplicate itself, the conditions needed for exponential replication of the two strands would have been established [see illustration on preceding page]. This scenario is certainly very optimistic, but it could be correct

You are welcome for the page. I googled on "theory origin life earth" and picked the first page.

Any mention of the origins of life are not science due to the unfalsifiable nature of the subject.

This statement is incorrect. The methods of science are indeed applicable to studying the origins of life.

Hypothesize. Test. Modify. Repeat.

That's how theories are developed. You are mixing terms and criteria with your claim. Any subject, including origin studies, can be investigated scientifically.