Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
I posted directly to your post.

Then I will post directly to your post. You hypocritically talk out of both sides of your mouth. You posture before the creationists as one not believing in common descent with modification. You deflect any rebuttal by protesting that you do.

You attack all the evidence for what you supposedly accept as true. Thus you resemble the lawyers for the California child murderer, lawyers who presented a case in court which tried to undermine points of the prosecution case which they knew to be true.

I don't know why I protest at this, except that I'm tired of seeing it in my reply queue. God knows you're a self-discrediting, obvious humbug.

245 posted on 10/07/2002 7:57:19 AM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro; scripter
Perfect Ad Hominem. You have not countered my original explanation to scripter.---

Those are the "fossil bones" of a mesonychid. Not too long ago the paleontologists had a carefully plotted linkage from those bones to Flipper. Then real science stepped in and provided overwhelming evidence that whales and hippos are kissing cousins. That left the flustered bone-pickers rather speechless for a fraction of second. Science being what it is, something had to give, not the theory, but the evidence was changed. Things that were huggably close to the mesonychid have stepped a small distance away. The predictions have been forgotten and have not been counted against the theory. The theory remains intact unmarred by the "changed" evidence. Thus my attributing "Paleontologists suck as paleontologists".

246 posted on 10/07/2002 8:00:23 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson