[riggedtosail]

Quite the opposite. A growing body of evidence is beginning to prove a young earth from a scientific standpoint, which then leads to disprove the theory of evolution. Funny, I ran into a well thought of heart surgeon a few months back and he mentioned that there had to be a creator. Just the complexities of how the human heart works is enough justification for him. I guess he wouldn't make it to med school now.

[VadeRetro]

A growing body of evidence is beginning to prove a young earth from a scientific standpoint...

So easy to say. This growing body is published where? AnswersinGenesis? ICR?

[Quix]

HEY GROUP,

Genesis says before Adam,

THE WORLD WAS VOID AND WITHOUT FORM

WE DO NOT KNOW

WHAT
BEFORE
THAT
!!!

There could have been talking trees and stationary dinasaurs and Winnie The Poohs everywhere for all any of US know. This old globe could have been recycled by an Almighty God an unknowable number of times from our perspective. Some residue might have been left around to humor the heavens as we scratch our heads.

I don't know that it matters a great deal to anything we have to make crucial decisions about whether the beginning of Adam was 6,000 or 60,000 years ago. I'm inclined to think it was likely significantly longer ago than 6,000 years as we know them. But then if light has been slowing down--all kinds of standards don't look quite as rigid as we've tended to construe them.

Just my 2NT$ worth.