Replies

From your pro-Damadian link

But Dr. Damadian's initial work had several flaws. His scanning method relied on a point-by-point analysis of the entire human body, which proved impractical.

Exactly.

This is simply not imaging, in the sense in which everyone in the field describes it, any more than taking an individual X-ray of every small part of the body is a CAT scan. As far as I can tell, Damadian does not even understand the mathematics of reconstructing a three dimensional image from two dimensional projections. And Damadian's contention that he would have 'eventually' come up with Lauterbur's insight is an admission of failure. The fact is, he didn't, and then he disgraced himself by fighting a 25 year campaign to steal credit for another man's work. But you can take in a lot of suckers with a $100m bankroll.

This is simply not imaging, in the sense in which everyone in the field describes it,

Then to what was Lauterbur referring in his 1972 paper?

A new imaging technique called zeugmatography is disclosed which takes advantage of induced local interactions to overcome the wavelength-dependence limitation of normal imaging systems.

"Carnegie Institution scientist George Wetherell recently determined that the arrangement of the planets in our solar system is propitious for life on earth. He believes that the giant planet Jupiter, bigger by two and a half times than all the other planets combined and with a colossal gravitational pull, tends to protect the inner planets from impacts from comets. In his judgment, the earth would be struck a thousand times more frequently were Jupiter not exactly where it is. Moreover, according to French astrophysicist Jacques Laskar, the highly regular orbits of Jupiter, Saturn, and the other outer planets act to stabilize the orbits of the inner planets, including that of the earth. Were that not the case, drastic changes in orbit would make our climate inhospitable for life. Dr. Hugh Ross points out that were the earth's mean temperature to cool by just a few degrees, the planet would experience a runaway freeze-up. Conversely, were the mean temperature to increase a few degrees, conditions would be generated that would cause a steady, ever-continuing rise in surface temperature. But none of these things happen; the earth's temperature remains constant."

"Ross points out a truly amazing case of planning by an Intelligent Creator: "The sun's luminosity ... has increased by more than 35 percent since life was first introduced on earth. Such a change is more than enough to exterminate life. But life survived on earth because the increase in solar luminosity was exactly cancelled out each step of the way by a decrease in the efficiency of the greenhouse effect in earth's atmosphere. The decrease in greenhouse efficiency arose through the careful introduction of just the right species of life in just the right quantities at just the right times."

"How, he asks, could a... strictly natural Darwinian---process anticipate the physics of solar burning?"