There is much science, especially statistical/mathematic, against it. That the universe had a beginning--and a mere 12-18 billion years ago--is profoundly powerful evidence in support of Genesis and against Darwin's "just so--something from nothing" stories.
Honest evolutionists far better informed and more intelligent than you privately admit the gross inadequacies of their so-called theory to explain how life got started so quickly in such a young universe. "Negative entropy" (not thermodynamic, but Shannon-informational) is a physical miracle beyond their skills to even begin to explain in any way, shape, or fashion.
You are insufficiently intelligent to know the grave flaws of your own materialist absolutist faith. Or, you lack sufficient understanding. Or both.
You choose.
The only "science" against evolution is what you read in the creationist propaganda books. There is little if any creation science in the scientific publications
Nonsense
"Negative entropy" (not thermodynamic, but Shannon-informational) is a physical miracle beyond their skills to even begin to explain in any way, shape, or fashion.
That statistical and thermodynamic entropy are one and the same was shown 100 years ago.
You are insufficiently intelligent to know the grave flaws of your own materialist absolutist faith. Or, you lack sufficient understanding. Or both.
So what year was your Nobel prize awarded?