Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The UN is Communist
EtherZone ^ | October 11, 2002 | Alan Stang

Posted on 10/05/2002 8:21:24 PM PDT by SEA

THE UN IS COMMUNIST

By: Alan Stang

For weeks, we have been looking at the major American wars of the Twentieth Century, in order to provide a context of understanding for the present war on Iraq. We have seen that, in behalf of their perennial goal of world government, our own leaders tricked us into both world wars by arranging for the murders of thousands of our own people. The next war we need to look at is the war in Korea, and to understand the war in Korea we need to look first at the United Nations.

The war in Korea was the first war the United States fought in behalf of the UN, under UN direction, for UN purposes. The present war on Iraq is another. It is painfully obvious that President Bush wants the UN to serve as protective cover for Washington's purposes. So, what is the UN? The United Nations was conceived by Communists and has always been run by Communists for Communist purposes.

Remember that after World War I, the world government conspirators failed to arrange American entry into the League of Nations, which was then the rudimentary framework of the world government they were trying to create. They inundated the American people with world government propaganda through conspiratorial outfits like the Council on Foreign Relations, with the result that they were successful in putting the United States into the United Nations after World War II.

The UN was founded at the San Francisco Conference in 1945, as the war was coming to an end. The Secretary-General at the UN conference was a distinguished gentleman names Alger Hiss, movie star-handsome, endlessly efficient and consummately charming. Hiss helped draft the UN Charter. Without credentials signed by Alger Hiss, it was impossible to get into the conference. In a historic news photo that probably appeared on the front page of every newspaper in the United States, President Harry S. Truman and Hiss are shown together on the dais.

As Director of the State Department's Office of Special Political Affairs, Hiss appointed the members of the U.S. delegation to the UN. At the infamous Yalta Conference in the Soviet Union, in February, 1945, where much of this was arranged and where central Europe was secretly deeded to Stalin, Hiss stood at the dying Roosevelt's elbow.

There was only one problem. Alger Hiss was later exposed as a Soviet spy; he was convicted of perjury and imprisoned for lying under oath about his Communist activities. No doubt that was why, at the first London Conference in 1946, a couple of years before he was exposed, Hiss arranged for the Soviets to run UN military activities and for the United States to run UN financial activities, which meant in effect that the Soviet Union won the right to run the UN and we won the right to pay for it. It is important to note that Alger Hiss was just one of many Soviet UN maggots. How likely is it, do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know all this?

Remember that the purpose of all this was and remains the creation of a world government, in which our own U.S. government would at first be subservient and later dissolved. One of your Intrepid Correspondent's books could be helpful in this discussion. In The Actor (Boston, Western Islands, 1968), you will find for instance the following statement published by Foreign Affairs, the monthly periodical of the Council on Foreign Relations. John Foster Dulles, the Marxist revolutionary who was Eisenhower's Secretary of State, is talking here about UN legislation: ". . . The achievement of such a body of laws calls for a lawmaking process. And to enforce them there is required. . . a judicial system and police force. . ." So far, we haven't been able to arrange this, Dulles complains. But then he adds, "We must not accept that condition as permanent. . . ."

Hmm. Let's see. A legislature. A judiciary. A military. Wouldn't all that add up to a government? How likely is it, do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know all this?

Perhaps the best proof of what is happening comes from our own government. If you have never heard of this before, you will probably not believe it. The only thing we can suggest is that you take no one's word for it, including mine. You can easily check it out for yourself. It is very short; you could read the whole thing in a few minutes.

We are talking of course about the State Department Publication 7277, entitled Freedom From War, The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World, released in September 1961, during the Kennedy Administration. This was and remains official U.S. government policy: "The disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their reestablishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal order. . ."

Remember, we warned you. Now, get up off the floor, find your bifocals and read it again. It really does say what you thought it did, doesn't it? Official U.S. government policy is to eliminate all militaries, including our own. What would happen to those militaries? Would they just be disbanded? Would their arsenals just be destroyed?

No, Pilgrim. They would be handed over to something called the United Nations Peace Force. ". . . In Stage III progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force. . ."

So, when the process is complete, we would be completely defenseless. We would have no military, none at all. The UN would have an invincible military, invincible because no nation could challenge it. Right now, that lesson is being taught to Iraq, which will soon be disarmed. Always the first target of such a Communist tactic is somebody everyone dislikes.

And the UN was conceived by Communists, was founded by Communists and always has been run by Communists for Communist purposes. This would eventually mean the complete Communist subjugation of the United States. Surely none of my very knowledgeable readers subscribes to the preposterous Communist canard that Communism is "dead."

Okay, maybe some Communist lunatic left over by the departing Alger Hiss wrote 7277. But the date on the subversion is 1961, more than forty years ago, an eternity in this fast-moving world. Maybe Jack Kennedy was too busy chasing Fiddle and Faddle in the White House to know about it in the first place. And how do we know it is still U.S. government policy today? Sorry, Pilgrim, we know it because once in a while we check on its status and it is still in force. How likely is it , do you think, that George W. Bush doesn't know about this?

Bush lately has been calling for an ever-stronger UN, a UN with "spine," a UN with "backbone," a UN determined to avoid the fate of the League of Nations. As we have seen, such a UN would mean world dictatorship. To dramatize his commitment, Bush has put the United States back into UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, which the United States quit many years ago.

UNESCO was flooding the nation's schools with Communist world government propaganda. That was one of its main purposes. See the UN series entitled Toward World Understanding. As always, read and decide for yourself. UNESCO hasn't changed a jot, not even a tittle, but here we are in it again, thanks to George Bush. Is the hair on the back of your neck standing up? We're sorry, ladies. Maybe you can work it into an exciting, new style.

Along these lines, UNICEF, the UN Children's Fund, has recently been pushing child sex with homosexuals and with animals. In South Africa, a UNICEF outfit called LoveLife promotes sodomy and abortion. Would the victims of such programs be black?

And in the issue of June 24th, 1997, the solidly leftist Village Voice, which calls itself America's largest weekly newspaper, reported in excruciating detail on sexual exploitation, torture and murder of children, by UN "Peacekeeping" soldiers, including photographs of UN goons literally burning a living child. This story should have been on the front page of every newspaper in the United States. Have you ever heard about it? Does George W. Bush know?

So, now we're ready to look at the UN's war in Korea, the third of the major wars our leaders tricked us into during the Twentieth Century. Be with your obedient servant next week.

Related Articles:

World Government Frenzy(Part I)

World Government Frenzy (Part II)

Worse Than Japan

"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: alger; bilderberger; bush; cfr; communist; delano; federalrerve; hiss; iraq; johnbirch; oneworldorder; prescot; todd; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: SEA
THE FREEDOM WRITER'S DILEMMA
I really should get out more.
21 posted on 10/05/2002 9:18:45 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
More like the most-leftist Socialists they can be. They don't quite have the political or military strength to be full-blown Communists yet. That acquired power would allow them to imprison or murder everyone who speaks out against them in public. Those drunk with power and illusions of greatness can't initiate their desires until they disarm and pacify the sheeple. You won't see how nasty they can be until that happens. They seem to the world as caring, pacifist leaders for now. Paging Hillary, Feinstein, Schumer, Bonior, Sarah, etc, etc, ....Communism is merely Socialists with guns.
22 posted on 10/05/2002 9:24:01 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
I've read it over a few times. Is he implying that Dubya is also communist? I mean, this article is portraying the coming war in Iraq as a bad thing, is it not? Saying that this is just the beginning?
23 posted on 10/05/2002 9:32:44 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
Secrets, Lies, and Atomic Spies,.....Or... Joe McCarthy was more right than he ever knew
24 posted on 10/05/2002 9:37:17 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
Can anyone name one popularly elected official in the UN?
25 posted on 10/05/2002 9:43:41 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
Good article, there is nothing there that I didn't already know.

I guess this means that the John Birch Society has been right all along.

26 posted on 10/05/2002 10:01:18 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SEA
the sky is blue, bears poop in the woods.....
27 posted on 10/05/2002 10:32:36 PM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
LOL! My thoughts exactly! We need to divest from that sick organization ASAP!
28 posted on 10/05/2002 10:39:13 PM PDT by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SEA
Let's see... We should start a contest:
The U.N. is Communist.
The Pope wears a funny hat (saw that one on here today, LOL).
The sun sets in the evening.

Hillary and Vera Katz are hideous old harpies.

Free Republic makes Liberals mad.

...

29 posted on 10/06/2002 12:20:38 AM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1
I guess this means that the John Birch Society has been right all along.

Don't say that. You'll be labeled as an extremist.

30 posted on 10/06/2002 12:28:35 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
I guess Frank Burns Was right all along too.
31 posted on 10/06/2002 1:20:14 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
I guess Frank Burns Was right all along too.

You'll have to fill me in on that one. I don't remember what Frank Burns said on the subject, I thought he only thought about Margaret. MASH is drivel anyway, Alan Alda is the soccer mom's thenthitive god. My next-door neighbor for awhile was a Korean War vet, he was stuck at Chosin Reservoir in the dead of winter. I didn't get the impression he was too impressed with the TV version, the little he told me about it.

32 posted on 10/06/2002 1:34:31 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SEA
The UN is Communist

What you really have are dictators and socialists and they all have one thing in common. The concentrated power of the state.

The UN is Statist -- should be the headline.

33 posted on 10/06/2002 8:32:30 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
An improvement in the New York City skyline I'd like to see...


34 posted on 10/06/2002 8:38:11 AM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
LOL so what... used to be that if the word (s) global government, One World Order,Global Community,globalization,One worlders,New World Order, (NWO) was used; you were a crazy no brained hillbilly dufus militia freak nutcase named Bubba.
35 posted on 10/06/2002 11:33:22 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: daylate-dollarshort
bump
36 posted on 10/06/2002 11:34:05 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SEA
The UN isn't communist, it's UNist, it's out for itself, and only itself. It uses any excuse it can to grow and grow and grow.
37 posted on 10/06/2002 11:35:33 AM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
Well most TV shows are drivel. But MASH is still better than what’s on now.

With out getting into the whole MASH show Some of the saying of his they made fun of

“ Get the US out of the UN “
“ Better dead than red “

38 posted on 10/07/2002 4:08:32 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: quietolong
With out getting into the whole MASH show Some of the saying of his they made fun of “ Get the US out of the UN “ “ Better dead than red “

Dang, if Frank Burns said that stuff, cool. Funny though, he was portrayed as a nut-job, for saying such awful things, eh? Alan Alda is still a chicken-$h|+, so I don't watch the show any more, just because I can't stand what he stands for. He's just another wild-eyed, Donahue-type liberal that reaps the rewards of the system he pretends to hate.

39 posted on 10/07/2002 4:43:52 AM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SEA
b u m p
40 posted on 03/11/2003 5:02:36 PM PST by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson