Replies

Ah, so if we had lots of violence in our streets and in our cities by an identifiable group or groups of individuals, we would be justified in imposing a curfew on them and in taking pro-active police measures against them?

But of course. What planet do you live on? Are you a libertarian or something?

I would appreciate your taking a less-hostile tone, as I have done nothing to offend you.

Sorry but you have offended me. Foolish comments about Israel offend me since Israel is in peril and under fire from the never ending Jihad. Existing in the MidEast is very serious business.
If Israel were not under the gun I could care less about your throwaway comments

I am grateful that you answered my prior question, and look forward to your answer to this one.

>Ah, so if we had lots of violence in our streets and in our cities by an identifiable group or groups of individuals,
>we would be justified in imposing a curfew on them and in taking pro-active police measures against them?

But of course. What planet do you live on? Are you a libertarian or something?

Good answer. I just want to be clear that that I am understanding you to say that it is acceptable to establish a "separate but equal" doctrine based upon creed and color. Not many people are as honest as you are, and I admire you for this. After all, if it is good enough for Israel, it is good enough for us, correct?

I understand that Israel is in peril because it harbors in its borders a group of people bent upon its very destruction and the extermination of the group of people who founded the nation. I am intrigued that so many so-called conservatives think that this is a unique situation never-before seen the history of the world. Multiculturalism tends to lead to these kinds of blood feuds. Tell me, what was your stance on apartied in South Africa?