The US Supreme Court ruled three times in the Election fiasco of 2000:
Regarding the inability of any authority to change the rules of a Federal election after the process started (in Floriduh's case, changing the counting and reporting rules in an Electoral College election), it was 9-0.
Regarding the failure to provide equal protection of the voters and their ballots, it was 7-2.
Regarding the complete lack of a Constitutional "remedy" for the Sore Loserman campaign, it was 5-4.
The last one is the one the Dems like to latch onto, but the other two are the key ones, IMHO.