To: joesnuffy
The Kennedy wackiness aside, Specter wouldn't touch this if he didn't think it had some merit. Read up on it, it is compelling, but by no means definative evidence.
To: FreeperinRATcage
The Kennedy wackiness aside, Specter wouldn't touch this if he didn't think it had some merit. Specter wouldn't touch it if he didn't think there was something in it for him. He apparently recognizes that times have changed.
Which doesn't necessarily mean that the conspiracy theories about OKC are incorrect. Myself, I believe those conspiracy theories.
And if Specter's shift indicates that a power shift may now lead to the revelation of previously concealed truths, we may soon find out a lot that has been kept hidden from us.
To: FreeperinRATcage
Oh sure... He'll investigate and then have a Senate trial under Scottish Law! Ha Ha Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaa!
That Democrat lawyer for the house impeachment whose good name escapes me right now has been helping her a lot lately. (David Schippers, that's it!)
To: FreeperinRATcage
Good grief. Don't be ridiculous. Specter is not to trusted with anything.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson