[stalin]

Scientific American is not junk science.

[farmfriend]

I read that too but it can have a liberal slant. Science can be subjective, as much as we like to believe it is not. If you can wade through Scientific American, you should have no trouble with Mark's book. Wouldn't you prefer to do something about the problem of both enviromental conservation and property rights preservation? Wouldn't doing something to solve the problem be preferable to arguing over the cause? Read my long posts, check out my links, buy the book and even discuss it with the author. He will answer any questions you have.

[editor-surveyor]

"Scientific American is not junk science."

Scientific American is not science, but it certainly is JUNK.

Nothing but biased, ignorant, academic posturing and psuedo-intellectual psycho-masturbational blather.