Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MichiganConservative; PhiKapMom
Great points.

I'd like to point out that all the scare talk over stock market losses is pure propaganda. Under Republican proposals, one would have control of his social security funds, and the government would not force him to put it all in stocks. If someone just put it all in top quality three year corporate bonds, he would still retire with a six figure account instead of a shaky promise that he would get his children's money.

If I were in my twenties or thirties I would put most of it in stocks given the chance. Over thirty to forty years one would only lose his money if America fails.
43 posted on 10/05/2002 12:06:54 PM PDT by SupplySider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: SupplySider
"If I were in my twenties or thirties I would put most of it in stocks given the chance. Over thirty to forty years one would only lose his money if America fails."

I agree. If we could have invested in the market we all would have had a much better return on our money.

This is only a small amount that will be invested, 2% is the sum I recall hearing. Much smaller than what I believe is currently allowed for Government workers who CAN invest part of their retirement funds in the same stock market that we cannot.

I never ever see a mention that Clinton not only signed a tax on Social Security but it was also retroactive.

44 posted on 10/05/2002 3:26:21 PM PDT by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson