I don't know this guy's track record. I think SD, MO, and NJ are still trending our way; and I think Iowa is a possible pickup. But the House is clearly not in play now. Little Dick, "El Poco Loco," knows it.
1 posted on
10/03/2002 3:46:32 PM PDT by
LS
To: LS
HE HAS THE TORICELLI/LOUSENBERG SCAM MAKING THAT STATE NOW "LEAN DEM" WHEN IT WAS LEANING GOP! He's wrong on this one! It's going to backfire big time on the NJ rats.
To: LS
I haven't seen the new Harkin/Ganske numbers. What are they? All I have heard about is Republican internal polling that had Ganske within 4% which means absolutely nothing. Leaked internal polls are simply to keep the fundraising going.
4 posted on
10/03/2002 3:52:49 PM PDT by
shempy
To: LS
I don't know this guy's track record.He's like Zogby - he never met a demonrat he didn't like.
6 posted on
10/03/2002 4:02:44 PM PDT by
mombonn
To: LS
This NJ thing could backfire on the Democraps nationwide. Changing the rules like this is unAmerican, unless you're a diehard-lefty-pinko-yellow-dog democrap.
7 posted on
10/03/2002 4:05:39 PM PDT by
A. Morgan
To: KQQL
fyi
To: LS
He has AK leaning Dem now. This guy is seriously uninformed. Stevens (R) is leading Vondersaar (D) by at least 25 points. It's not even a serious challange.
To: LS
He has AK leaning Dem now Alaska? This would be bigger than the Good Friday earthquake.
To: LS
Larry Sabato is a thoughtful scholar. (Echols Scholar at UVa).
He was also (just out of college in the 1970's) a campaign manager for a very liberal Democratic candidate for Virginia Governor.
Now speaks with a tone of moderation, but I think old leanings are still there.
He's very knowledgeable about Virginia politics.
To: LS
Notice there's no mention of Montana - a state where W got like 60 percent and where the Dem incumbent, Baucus, would have been vulnerable to Racicot. But Racicot didn't care enough about taking back the Senate to become a candidate.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson