To: Pokey78
There followed the usual flurry of huffy emails insisting this proved absolutely nothing as the cowardly Yanks hadnt had the guts to send in ground troops.So there is still a segment of the British population who thinks the best way to fight is to send men in formation and let everyone line up and shoot at each other? I think I'll take Francis "The Swamp Fox" Marion's approach over there way.
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
So there is still a segment of the British population who thinks the best way to fight is to send men in formation and let everyone line up and shoot at each other? I think I'll take Francis "The Swamp Fox" Marion's approach over there way. I had some EuroTrash punks whining about how unfair it all was that the U.S. lost hardly no troops in Desert Storm. I thought that I argued persuasively about the purpose of war, i.e., to kill the enemy and break his stuff, and the goal of not getting your own troops killed in the process when possible, but they were adamant about their disgust with American kill ratios.
Europe is a lost cause.
24 posted on
10/03/2002 7:53:42 AM PDT by
Smedley
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
*So there is still a segment of the British population who thinks the best way to fight is to send men in formation and let everyone line up and shoot at each other?
This are just bozo Brits barfing up with what they've been feeding on. In the end the government stands with us. That's what counts.
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
There followed the usual flurry of huffy emails insisting this proved absolutely nothing as the cowardly Yanks hadnt had the guts to send in ground troops. This isn't a distinctly British viewpoint. This idea is held by everyone who wants the US defeated and is jealous that we have better technology (force multipliers) than our 11th century opponents. Too bad for them, eh?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson