Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polybius
An overstatement on my part.

We now have a policy of pre-emptive strikes against potential threats. Don't you think this might lead to equivalent policies by other nations? Perhaps even against us?

268 posted on 10/03/2002 8:28:09 AM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: UnBlinkingEye
An overstatement on my part. We now have a policy of pre-emptive strikes against potential threats. Don't you think this might lead to equivalent policies by other nations? Perhaps even against us?

Yes, it might. This is obviously a potentially dangerous 2-edged sword that must be used wisely.

The wisdom of a course of action or inaction is often determined with 20/20 hindsight. A pre-emptive strike against Germany in 1935 when Hitler renounced the Versaille Treaty and declared Nazi Germany's intention to re-arm would have saved 40 million lives in the 1940's. On the flip side, the use of the claim "pre-emptive strike in self defense" can be abused to justify just about any military adventure.

Each case much be honestly debated on it's own merits as blanket rules seldom apply in the Real World.

273 posted on 10/03/2002 9:16:33 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson