Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Miss Marple
2 posted on
10/02/2002 3:32:30 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: Miss Marple
I think the best thing that Forrester could do is to paint this as a sleazy scheme to remove the New Jersey Senate seat from the democratic process. Lautenberg is 78. Is there a deal between Lautenberg, Torricelli, and McGreevey to let Lautenberg win and then let McGreevey put someone
else into office? Get Lautenberg to promise that he won't resign and McGreevey to promise that he isn't planning on a replacement.
I'm unemployed at the moment and have free time. I also live right off the Rutgers campus in Piscataway. I'll send you my contact information, via Freep mail, so you can get in touch with me.
To: Miss Marple
To: Miss Marple
To: Miss Marple
He served in the Senate for like 20 years hes got a paper trial a mile long.I guess the thing that lets you know what kind of man he is is the fact that he was willing to take the disgraced Torecelli's spot when Bill Bradley,PAllone, and the others turned it down.
Oh, and i think Simon shoul step down and let Arnold run against davis. And Racicot should take over the republican campaign in Montana. Anybody other than the Angels ought to be playing the Yankees cause the Angels are going to get creamed.
To: Miss Marple
Haven't done any research yet, but the best strategic idea I've seen so far, was suggested by someone (who?) on another thread. I think the pubbies ought to get Lautenberg's retirement speech, in which he outlines the reasons that he was retiring from the Senate, and run it in commercials.
To: Miss Marple
The expert on Fox is saying there might not be too many ways to appeal this, so Forrester's best choice, IMO, is to start running against Lautenberg this second.
9 posted on
10/02/2002 3:42:04 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Miss Marple
To: Miss Marple
First debate, Forrester needs to look over there and say "Mr. Senator are you physically up to the demands of this job? I can wake you when I finish each of my statements if you'd like." On a more serious note, NJ voters will not care. But what the Pubbies need to do is get military voters on camera stating (from overseas) that they had already voted and have been told their votes won't count because they used the "old ballots". That will positively piss off everyone in NJ. I don't care if the GOP makes up the video in the desert with a bunch of actors in Arizona. It would be brilliant.
To: Miss Marple
To: Miss Marple
I strongly recommend that anyone who has information that might help the Forrester campaign, DO NOT POST IT ON ANY WEB SITE!
Instead send it or better yet have one of the regular posters who are active with the campaign, bring to the headquarters.
There is no use in formation that will be read by the Democrap lurkers here on FR!
To: Miss Marple
Rutgers University is right up the street, if I find anything I will be sure to post them here.
To: Miss Marple
Forrester should not let up on Torricelli's enablers.
"Mr. Lautenburg, why did you not speak out about Sen. Torricelli's wholesale corruption?"
"Mr. Lautenburg, when you saw the results of the Torricelli Princlple on 9/11, why didn't you speak out?
In addition, I have 3 more suggestions:"
1. Attack
2. Attack
3. Attack
22 posted on
10/02/2002 3:51:42 PM PDT by
Aegedius
To: Miss Marple
Here's a suggestion. Go to
opensecrets.org and look up what they've got on Frank. I looked quick at his last personal financial filing (1999?) and found, for instance, that he had $184,959 in retirement income from a company called Automatic Data Processing. His financial statements might make interesting reading. Not to mention his old donor lists.
23 posted on
10/02/2002 3:54:45 PM PDT by
mewzilla
To: Miss Marple
Good job. Shake it off, folks. Let's get busy and beat this old coot! No sulking. And I agree with what Fred Barnes just said to Brit on Fox: forget the courts. Let's roll.
Unfortunatly, the only thing I can say about the Louse is that I went to high school with his niece, who cleaned out my notebook for me.
27 posted on
10/02/2002 4:00:04 PM PDT by
Huck
To: Miss Marple
There has to be a deal! Lautenberg quit, he has already declared that he now longer wishes to serve and has acted on that declaration. He quit!! If he had wanted to return for the good of the country (to replace a crooked theif in the Senate), he would have acted in the state primary. His action is no for the good of the country but only for the good of his Jersey party.
Thsu, nothing he says or does can be trusted to be in the best interests of the country. If elected, he will not serve out his term. He will only keep the seat warm until a replacement can be recruited (does Torricelli have enough on the governor to force him to reappoint Bob to a seat he could not win?). We must hit on the "if he wanted to be senator for the country, he would have run in the primary" and "more disgrace and corruption from Jersey in the eyes of the rest of the country."
What were his committees? What did they do? How did he vote on resolutions related to war and on appointments? What is available from the FBI via a FOIA request? Who were his staff members? Are private videos available? The media will already be destroying any news tape that makes Lautenberg look dumb, old or crooked. Has he paid all his real estate taxes? Does he employ any illegal aliens and not pay the taxes for them? Drunk driving? How about his family members? Any convictions or unexplained wealth? This is Jersey, the integrity state. Even if corruption doesn't offend dems in Jersey, it might influence voters in other states and force them to realize how filthy these people really are.
28 posted on
10/02/2002 4:02:02 PM PDT by
Tacis
To: Miss Marple
This one is critical and timely.
Lautenberg voted AGAINST authorizing military action against Iraq.
Cut & Paste Link: http://www.senate.gov/~rpc/rva/1021/10212.htm
I repeat:
LAUTENBERG VOTED AGAINST OPERATION DESERT STORM
To: Miss Marple; All
Miss M, here's what I use:
General search engines:
HotBot
Description: An advanced search engine. There are many configurable options, both in simple as in advanced search mode.
-http://www.google.com/advanced_search--
-http://www.profusion.com/--
|
100's OF SEARCH ENGINES Specific search engines: Skipease: White pages, Yellow pages, Reverse lookups, US Govt. Directories, Inmate/Prison locators, SS# info, Bankruptcy, Owner of Domain names, Medical profession, Campaign Contributions, Deceased person, US Corporation info, etc. NewsTrove
-http://www.opensecrets.org/-- -http://www.issues2000.org/-- -http://www.activistcash.com-- -http://www.consumerfreedom.com-- -http://www.ussearch.com/wlcs/index.jsp?srcAdID=4040003011&sourceid=-- www.guidestar.org
|
30 posted on
10/02/2002 4:04:00 PM PDT by
backhoe
To: Miss Marple
Good thread. What I would like to see is the reasons he left the senate, preferably in his own words. I think it would be powerful to have him disqualify himself and it would be a good question for Forestor to keep asking "why do you want to run", besides saving the RATS from defeat and "what makes anyone think the RAT gov won't appoint the Torch to finish your term ?
To: Miss Marple
Whatever we come up with, Miss Marple .. it would be nice if our laundry list were:
51 reasons why ...
36 posted on
10/02/2002 4:10:33 PM PDT by
Pegita
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
