To: The Wizard
So why did the Republican justices agree with the ruling??? The vote was unanimous - that says something very important: either we aren't getting the full story about what the law says, or there's hardcore corruption going on (pity the latter seems more likely).
To: ctdonath2
Re: #28
An interseting point.
Has anyone actually read the decision yet? I, like everyone else, seem to be forming an opinion about this ruling based on limited facts and the opinion of others.
39 posted on
10/03/2002 9:31:58 AM PDT by
templar
To: ctdonath2
Those were RINO justices. And this is NJ we're talking about, where most of the government could comfortably sleep on a corkscrew.
41 posted on
10/03/2002 9:34:22 AM PDT by
mewzilla
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson