Replies

LOL! Its a partisan decision created by a kangaroo court to help the losing side in a political contest. The fact its issued by the state's highest tribunal doesn't make it any less partisan and more to the point - its not really a precedent at all. Its a one-time rule created by and for Democrats. If Republicans came along with a similar argument for a losing candidate they wanted to replace, they'd be taken to the woodshed. But when it comes to breaking the law, rest assured the Democrats will get special treatment from friendly corrupt justices. Well today in New Jersey we found out the state's politics really does live up to its notorious reputation. Tony Soprano would have heartily approved of the way the Rats agony was "fixed" for them today.

its not really a precedent at all. Its a one-time rule created by and for Democrats

You see, I agree with you 100%. It is because of this that I think that NOW is the time to use their own opinion against them. The legal gymnastics will be entertaining, and the havoc that this SCONJ opinion will cause is best felt NOW while the ink hasn't dried yet. This will show the public the dangers of judicial activism and the bias of the court.

So what's not to like!