NJSC Dems can replace Tori's on ballot - Pubbies appealing

[Edmund Burke]

America is all through. It is just a matter of time now before the entire thing collapses.

[dhfnc]

You are so right! Thanks for the reply, I need to vent!

[dhfnc]

America is all through. It is just a matter of time now before the entire thing collapses.

I am afraid you are right!

[CharacterCounts]

If Forrester beats Lautenberg in the election like a rented mule, and then the US Supreme Court does the same to the NJ SC AFTER the election, it is a win-win-win proposition for the Republicans.

If Forrester wins before the SCOTUS decides wouln't the case then be moot. No harm, no foul.

[texasbluebell]

This is still a race. I think Lautenberg may lose this.

I think he'll lose too as a matter of fact. Forrester seems like a breath of fresh air compared to the usual suspects.

[dhfnc]

I think he'll lose too as a matter of fact. Forrester seems like a breath of fresh air compared to the usual suspects.

If he does not win, he will call for a recount. I promise you! The democrats have found a way to contest every election!

[texasbluebell]

Maybe my ears failed me, but I could have sworn she said that the USSC would hear this case tomorrow...

If she said that, she may have misspoken. Judge Napolitano on O'Reilly said that it will be next week, I'm pretty sure.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Not really.

[texasbluebell]

If he does not win, he will call for a recount. I promise you! The democrats have found a way to contest every election!

I know, I alternate between despair and misery over the state of politics today.

[SteveH]

Kicking up the dust inevitably depends on the compliant media to present a one sided view to the public.

Risky business. The more the media takes a one-sided view, the more that people catch on to it and cancel subscriptions or at least, begin to regard the paper's reporting and editorials as laughingstocks.

So any counterstrategy seems as if it ought to take that factor into effect. Perhaps counterstrick with a heavy bombardment of call-ins on talk radio. (Full page ads just feed the coffers of the liberal media with more cash for more liberal spin disguised as "news".)

[coder2]

I'm thinking she had to have mis-spoke too --- otherwise, she would have repeated it at the half-hour..

Thanks !

[Helms]

You have been mystified by her glossy lips. You know what they say about good looking lips and free association don't you?

[harpo11]

Maybe the NJ-Republicans can change the judges?

Maybe the NJ Judges can add 8 more Senator positions to be filled?

Why not? Anything goes for democrats.

What a flaming joke...a few months ago during the height of the corporate accounting scandals, they were disparaging President George W. Bush alleging that he skirted the rule of law when he sold a portion of his shares in his oil business to purchase a baseball team. Even though President Bush was cleared by the SEC after the transaction was investigated at least on four different occasions, the democrats still implied through innuendo and allegation that the SEC did not want to probe deep because of who George W. Bush was, a son of President Bush.

But the democrats were so concerned about the rule of law and disappointed that President Bush would not release certain papers they wanted to get their grimey claws on.

Bloomin' lunatic democrats will continue to wear law abiding citizens down to the point where we cease to care or object. God forbid that we sit back in complacency, no matter how brutal the liberal media assails republicans for endeavoring to follow the rule of law, allow that to happen.

[A Citizen Reporter]

"If Forrester wins before the SCOTUS decides wouln't the case then be moot. No harm, no foul."

Barbra Streisand! There is precedent in court decisions to be considered.

[Truth29]

Your argument might have merit if we were still accepting immigrants at a rate where they were assimilated. What we have now is a mass invasion (11 million illegals in the US now) that are not assimilating and, in fact, are balkanizing the US. Common language and common values are vanishing. We have large groups which are hostile to the US and a people and a government on our southern border that dream of the day when they can take the southwest back for Mexico.

[CharacterCounts]

Appeals court generally refuse to decide a case unless there is an actual controversy existing at the time of the decision. Our Supreme Court has in the past, agreed to hear a case only to later take it off the docket because the issue got otherwise resolved.

[LaGrone]

I did hear her say exactly that; however she is mistaken. Probably meant papers would be filed appealing the decision tomorrow.

[ChuteTheMall GawdSortaMount]

Is it too early to demand a recount?

[A Citizen Reporter]

These are extraordinary times, when evil-doers make extraordinary use of the state's judiciary. I'd say that since the RATS seem to think that all bets are off on existing laws, all bets are off on what the Supremes might do. But that's just MHO.

I believe that Lautenberg is as dead a duck as the Torch ever was. But the stupid party doesn't understand it yet.

[texasbluebell]

Well, Laurie did say what you thought she said, just now. She said it'll go to the high court tomorrow morning. So I don't know who's right.