Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJSC Dems can replace Tori's on ballot - Pubbies appealing

Posted on 10/02/2002 2:57:31 PM PDT by Liz

Pubbies may try for stay in circuit court.


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News
KEYWORDS: stutteringbafoon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-463 next last
To: ThinkDifferent
I heard a former RNC atty/analyist on Brit Hume's program. He said he gives it 50/50 chance for the SCOTUS to hear the case. He thinks the case is weak.
261 posted on 10/02/2002 4:13:22 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: All
Ok, you all are going to kill me but I read the statute and it's not clear that this is the wrong result. As to US Supreme Court review, more deference is given to states for US Senator elections. I doubt it will go to US Supreme Court.

If they're smart, the Republicans in charge of this will try US district court on equal protection.

But -- go ahead and accuse me of being a liberal, I'm *not* -- this actually isn't like Florida at all. In this case, the statute IS vague and the highest court in the state DOES have the right to construe it liberally (pun alert) under the applicable state law. Y'all will kill me, but I'm not going to get excited about this one. It's sufficiently solid from a legal perspective that I doubt it can be undone.
262 posted on 10/02/2002 4:13:25 PM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
but I can't believe NJ voters will let the Democrats get away with this perversion.

Watch and lean that they do not care. It is the power at all costs senario.

263 posted on 10/02/2002 4:13:51 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You expect the Dems in NJ to impeach those judges? They are STATE judges. So Feds have nothing to say about it. It would take impeachment actions brought by the citizens etc in New Jersey. I don't see that happening, do you?
264 posted on 10/02/2002 4:15:17 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
lean=learn.........wiskey bad!
265 posted on 10/02/2002 4:15:20 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ
So who repays Doug Forrester for all his expenses running against Toricelli. This is without a doubt the most bizarre ruling ever handed down......altho I guess Mt. Laurel II really has first place in that category.
266 posted on 10/02/2002 4:15:36 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
Are you logged in?
267 posted on 10/02/2002 4:15:50 PM PDT by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Actually, Joisey is known as the Garbage State.
268 posted on 10/02/2002 4:16:35 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
wHiskey is too......LOL
269 posted on 10/02/2002 4:17:20 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: justshe
LOL back atcha!
270 posted on 10/02/2002 4:18:20 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
ROFLOL!!!
271 posted on 10/02/2002 4:19:42 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
How many of these judges were appointed by a Republican?

I believe six of them.




272 posted on 10/02/2002 4:20:24 PM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
Guess the Judges will be putting up the $800,000 for their friends.
273 posted on 10/02/2002 4:20:25 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I would hesitate getting the USSC involved prior to the election. That probably would be playing into the Dem hands.

I agree. The thing is, there was no reason for Torricelli to withdraw. All he had to do was say that if elected, he would immediately step down and allow the governor to appoint a known replacement. The Democrats deliberately sent this into the courts to create chaos, and are almost certainly hoping they can energize their base nationwide with inane accusations of SCOTUS trying to "steal" "another" election.

274 posted on 10/02/2002 4:20:47 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Did they issue an opinion? If so, how can we access it?
275 posted on 10/02/2002 4:21:06 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Christ Todd a republican? LOLOlubyshi*muster!
276 posted on 10/02/2002 4:21:54 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina; Congressman Billybob
Our own Congressman BillyBob would be involved in filing an appeal with SCOTUS.

CBB, what's the news now?

277 posted on 10/02/2002 4:22:09 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
From CNN's article on this decision:

The Democrats argued there was legal precedent favoring a competitive election over the expense of developing new ballots.

All elections are competitive because of the write in and third party candidates.

Might be able to turn some libs against this decision (especially since it is happening within their party to one of their candidates). The leftist extremists are not fans of the big 2 parties; here is an example of their main party walking all over them.

I've got local Houston news on and have not heard this decision reported at all. Storm warning, Enron, murder, back to weather (then sports/entertainment). ABC top of the hour radio news ignored this as well.

Is this going to pass under the radar? I'm putting a poster of "7X Horse's ass" in my car window as I drive around. Most people won't get it, but then if anyone asks...

278 posted on 10/02/2002 4:22:38 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Thanks for the Ping.
279 posted on 10/02/2002 4:22:46 PM PDT by RightWingMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Sorry, think i am drunk................................................
280 posted on 10/02/2002 4:23:14 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-463 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson