[JohnGalt]

This is a sad day for the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, perhaps our finaly betrayal from the establishment.

This is another UN War, not a war in the national security interest of the United States in response to Iraqi involvement in WTC '93 and the Oklahoma City Bombing. There is no mention of any role in 9/11, so that tells me the evidence is cicumstantial at best.

A sad day indeed.

[TheDon]

I will sleep better at night once we have put this dog down. I was against the Yugo war, but with asymetric weapons, Iraq can do us great harm, and has voiced the desire to do so.

The potential of Iraq supplying transnational terrorists, particularly those who would do us harm, with asymetric weapons is too great to overlook until it happens.

[Smedley]

There is no mention of any role in 9/11, so that tells me the evidence is cicumstantial at best.

CHEER UP!

There doesn't need to be language about 9/11 as congress had already passed the requisite resolutions to allow Bush to attack Iraq long ago.

[advocate10]

(2) acting pursuant to this resolution is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organisations, including those nations, organisations or persons who planned, authorised, committed or aided the terrorists attacks that occurred on September 11 2001.

[Liberty Dog]

I have to agree with you John - I can't believe there are so many on this forum that are so excited to go to war. There certainly are many other countries that are more of a threat than Irag to the United States. I am surprised that people can't see through this and realize it is about oil!Sad day indeed.