[OXENinFLA]

Bump to that. The fact that the "Torch" even said that in his so-called withdraw speech. Republicans would do well to point this out to the sheeple of america that the reason why Torricelli droped out was because he was going to LOSE. and the dems don't want to lose control of the senate.

[KsSunflower]

It depends on what the statement, "shall not be made" means.

[BillCompton]

Wouldn't it be great if later today, the Libertarian party filed saying they wanted to replace their candidate because she couldn't win?

[Timesink]

Bump to that. The fact that the "Torch" even said that in his so-called withdraw speech. Republicans would do well to point this out to the sheeple of america that the reason why Torricelli droped out was because he was going to LOSE. and the dems don't want to lose control of the senate.

The sheeple have already figured it out. WNBC is running an online poll asking "Who should replace The Torch on the ballot?" Even before the freeping started, around EIGHTY-FIVE PERCENT had voted "nobody." Regardless of how this (il)legal maneuvering pans out, Forrester can go ahead and start measuring for the new curtains in his Senate office, IMHO.