[San Jacinto]

The fact the NJSC is taking a poll is the weirdest thing I have ever heard. What possible difference could a poll make in interpreting the law? The poll is for political purposes. The judges are appointed, so what do they care about a poll. The message to take a poll must have come from McGreevy.

[Wphile]

The message to take a poll must have come from McGreevy.

Don't forget the mastermind behind all of this...bill clinton. He took a poll on what kind of vacation to take. Of course, he would suggest that the Supreme Court take a poll. That man is the poison pill of our electoral process. I detest him with all my heart and soul.

[jdontom]

New witness from Libutarian party

[gridlock]

I don't think the NJSC is taking a poll. I think they are genuinely accepting arguments in order to make a decision. Nothing wrong with that. Somebody might bring up a matter on the phone that they did not hear in court.

To ahead, give them a call. Make a good and novel argument that they may not have heard before. For instance, you could argue that 35 days would not have been enough time for the public to discern that Torricelli was dirty, and his replacement might be just as dirty, but would escape public scrutiny because of the shortened campaign. Or you could argue that replacing candidates at the last minute with ringers could become commonplace, and the primary process will be rendered meaningless.

Think of an argument, write it down, and give them a call.

Be nice, but forceful.

Leave your name.

[Huck]

Someone please call the Star Ledger and Bergen Record etc and tell them that the NJSC is taking a freaking POLL!!!!! I have to go work now. Please someone get this word out. Call FOX News!!!