[Oldeconomybuyer]

DNC Lawyer - Voters have an "over-arching" right to have competitive elections...

[hchutch]

Allow me to re-write to coorrect Demoncrap spin:
"We want the right to pull a bait-and-switch."

If a business did this, it would rightfully be shut down and the owners would be lucky not to be in a 8-foot by 10-foot cell with a guy who says, "My name is Spike, honey."

[freedomcrusader]

DemonRAT lawyer arguing that criterion for arbitrarily replacing candidates on ballots is "IF you can fix it, fix it." Maybe subconsciously, he was thinking about elections when he made that statement, as opposed to ballots.

[tomkat]

so of course cspam cuts away to the daily house circlejerk ...

[Republican Wildcat]

A right to a competitive election? I guess McConnell has to be removed from the ballot here in Kentucky, then, since he's way ahead of a weak Democrat opponent. Ridiculous.

[TheBigB]

"Voters have an "over-arching" right to have competitive elections..."

YOU CANNOT INVENT RIGHTS OUT OF THIN AIR, G*DDA*IT!! THERE IS NO MORE "RIGHT A COMPETITIVE ELECTION" THAN THERE IS A RIGHT TO A DECENT PAIR OF SHOES. THE VOTERS OF NJ CAN VOTE FOR FORRESTER, TORRICELLI, THE GREEN, THE LIBERTARIAN, THE BUTCHER, THE BAKER, OR THE FRIGGIN' CANDLESTICK MAKER!! THEY CAN WRITE IN LOUSENBERG IF THEY WANT!! JUST BECAUSE LOUSENBERG'S NAME IS NOT ON THE BALLOT, THAT DOES NOT MEAN THE ELCTION IS NOT COMPETITIVE!! HOW THE #$%^& CAN THEY NOT SEE THAT??

Sorry. Sorry. I'm too PO'd to be polite about these damn RATS right now.

[Timesink]

DNC Lawyer - Voters have an "over-arching" right to have competitive elections...

No they don't. There are thousands of elections across the country every year where only one party even has a candidate on the ballot.