Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1Old Pro
You know, if the GOP made an argument to replace a perceived losing candidate nominated earlier in the primary on grounds of a deficit in the polls, it'd be laughed out of the courthouse for even making the argument and being subjected to national scorn for trying to "fix" an election. Well then, why isn't it happening to the Democrats? That's basically what they're doing here and its all self-interested partisanship, not principle.
447 posted on 10/02/2002 8:27:33 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
How many justices on the NJSC?
458 posted on 10/02/2002 8:28:25 AM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop
GOP lawyers now up.
459 posted on 10/02/2002 8:28:29 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

To: goldstategop
You know, if the GOP made an argument to replace a perceived losing candidate nominated earlier in the primary on grounds of a deficit in the polls, it'd be laughed out of the courthouse for even making the argument and being subjected to national scorn for trying to "fix" an election. Well then, why isn't it happening to the Democrats? That's basically what they're doing here and its all self-interested partisanship, not principle.

Because the american media is a wholly owned subsidiary of the DNC.
Same (and only) reason Clinton stayed in office.
471 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:32 AM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson