Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XJarhead
The current question of ths statute that provides for filling a vacancy within 30 days implies another statute would allow an election within 30 days. Therefore NJ has one statute requiring an election within 30 days and another statute that limits it to 51 days. It implies that 30 days is previously recognized as adequate time to conduct an election.
232 posted on 10/02/2002 7:58:53 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: VRWC_minion
Judge - What happens if the Torch remains on the ballot?
Judge - What happens if the Torch wins?

RAT - Elected someone who cannot serve.

Judge - How about the Missouri case? (ouch)
Judge - Torch on the ballot = a vote for the dem party?
245 posted on 10/02/2002 8:01:31 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
The rat: "people vote for a candidate, not the party" when referencing what would happen if T was left on the ballot said that the party could NOT replace him if he won the election! Deep sixed himself on this one.
251 posted on 10/02/2002 8:02:09 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: VRWC_minion
The current question of ths statute that provides for filling a vacancy within 30 days implies another statute would allow an election within 30 days. Therefore NJ has one statute requiring an election within 30 days and another statute that limits it to 51 days. It implies that 30 days is previously recognized as adequate time to conduct an election.

Wasn't that 51 days statute added in order to conform to some FEDERAL law?

479 posted on 10/02/2002 8:31:19 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson