[TheBigB]

I'm with you. I'll respectfully disagree with those who think the fix is in. We've seen the principles of the RATS already..."motive irrelevant"..."51 days doesn't mean 51 days"...I hope to heck the Pub lawyer says straight out, "What they're asking is for you to simply change the rules and allow it to be more favorable for them to win. There is no valid reason to change the ballot at this late date."

[XJarhead]

One key point will be to see how the justices respond to the write-in option that the Republican lawyer is sure to mention. It's really our best argument that the voters' choice is protected even if the ballot is not changed.

[mwl1]

I am at least comforted by the fact that the RATS did not drop a stink bomb - no legal surprises.... they have a very weak case. We'll soon see if we have a legitimate court.

[Helms]

Hey, I guess were were wrong but are now wiser.