 AP Photo
|
||||||
|
|
||
|
Posted on 10/01/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by eddie willers
By JOHN P. McALPIN, Associated Press Writer
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - Desperate to keep their single-seat majority in the Senate, Democrats have chosen former Sen. Frank Lautenberg to replace scandal-tainted Sen. Robert Torricelli ( news, bio, voting record) on the November ballot, The Associated Press has learned.
|
||||||||||||
The decision was reached Tuesday evening after a full day of meetings among top state Democrats, according to a party source familiar with the discussions.
An announcement was expected later Tuesday.
Earlier in the day, the 78-year-old Lautenberg indicated he was ready to run.
"I was there (in the Senate) 18 years, and I enjoyed virtually every day," Lautenberg said in a telephone interview from his car as he headed to the governor's mansion for meetings with top state Democrats. "I didn't like raising the money, but I'm not going to mind it as much this time, because it's kind of fresh start."
Whether Lautenberg's name will actually appear the ballot with Republican Douglas Forrester will be decided in court. Republicans say it is too late to replace Torricelli, who dropped out Monday as his poll numbers continued to fall amid questions about his ethics.
The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear arguments on the case Wednesday.
Sen. William Frist, chairman of the Senate GOP campaign committee, said Republicans would consider an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court ( news - web sites) if the New Jersey court rules in favor of the Democrats.
"This is a desperate grasp at getting around the law and the people of New Jersey are tired of having their leaders go around the law," he said.
Frist said some absentee ballots have already been cast and that other ballots have been distributed to military personnel overseas; the New Jersey Association of County Clerks said about 1,600 absentee ballots were mailed out.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said that by objecting to Torricelli's request, Republicans were "denying the people of New Jersey a choice" in the election.
Five months ago, Torricelli's Senate seat was considered relatively safe. But support plummeted after he was admonished by the Senate ethics committee for his relationship with a 1996 campaign supporter, and he soon became the most vulnerable incumbent in the country.
Few, however, expected a court fight five weeks before Election Day.
"This is one for the books," said Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia. "It will long be remembered."
Under New Jersey law, a party can replace a statewide nominee on the ballot if the person drops out at least 51 days before the election. Torricelli missed the deadline by 15 days.
However, Democrats say decades of state court decisions put voters' rights above filing deadlines and other technical guidelines.
Attorney General David Samson argued in papers filed with the court Tuesday that the justices have the power to relax the deadline to withdraw and allow Democrats to post another candidate. Samson, who was appointed to his job by Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey, said election laws have long been interpreted liberally to allow voters every opportunity.
Legal experts agreed.
"In a substantial number of those cases, the courts have ruled on the side of being inclusive," said Richard Perr, an election law professor at Rutgers University Law School.
Six of the seven justices on the state's highest court were appointed by a former Republican governor.
Lautenberg's selection as the potential Democratic savior is replete with irony. He and Torricelli feuded openly while serving together.
"I'm not in a gloating mode," Lautenberg said. "I don't want to be smug about this. It was unfortunate for him and an unfortunate thing for all of us."
Lautenberg is a supporter of abortion rights and staunch opponent of the death penalty. He brings two major strengths to the difficult bid: statewide name recognition and a huge reserve of personal wealth he can use in the campaign. Also, unlike the House members who were also considered as substitute candidates, he does not have anything to lose by running and losing.
Lautenberg was a business executive before serving three terms in the Senate, deciding against a re-election bid in 2000. He counted among his accomplishments a law requiring companies to disclose chemicals they release into the environment, a law banning smoking on domestic flights and a law banning gun ownership by those convicted of domestic violence.
It damn well better be. If they get away with this and win this seat, my faith in the political process will be forever shattered. The Dems are crooks and they are so bloody callous about it. Talk about a banana republic. The US election system has become a laughing stock.
Ah, they very well could be the same voters, you know? :-)
Is there not one dimmocrat who will stand up and insist his or her political party obey the laws they took an oath to uphold?
This is atonishing.
Hope she is wrong but I think she is right.
Chris Matthews was on MSNBC this morning being a pundit.
He said he likes Torricelli.
He characterized his "problems" just as you have summarized and alluded to Chang being unfamiliar with the law.
Does he honestly not know that Torricelli made the arrangements himself?
I really don't think the Dems have a case, mostly because of Toricelli's speech. BECAUSE HE DID NOT ADMIT TO CRIMINAL WRONGDOING, and instead proclaimed he just made a few mistakes just like Bill Clinton did. The one previous precedent in NJ where the time cutoff was overridden by the courts was when a candidate died. But, because the Torch has neither been booted by the Senate nor convicted of wrongdoing, exactly what can the Dems claim as extrenuating circumstances? Nothing, other than the fact that they are losing in the polls with Toricelli.
I know the NJ Supreme Court is fairly liberal. But I simply cannot envision the faintest legal doctrine they can find to override the law. If Torch had confessed of criminal wrongdoing, they could claim he could not take the seat if elected. But they don't even have that.
LOL!
LOL!
20 gallons of spaghetti sauce, 20 gallons of chili, 40 one-gallon size Tupperware bowls, and a new freezer.
Freedom ain't free.
Close, but not quite. When matters get complex, the media decides on the solution they prefer, present it as a fait accompli -- then do their best to ignore or out-talk any view that contradicts that.
The media is just as scared of a Republican victory as the DemonCRAP leadership and will do anything and everything they can to help prevent it.
Thats their out. If they could pull off this sham, then Lautenberg resigns for health reasons in February, and NJ Guv. appoints another RAT. The RATs even have enough nerve to appoint Torecelli back in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.