Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Senator (Lautenberg) to Replace Torricelli
AP via Yahoo ^ | 10/01/02 | JOHN P. McALPIN

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by eddie willers

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-484 next last
To: MileHi
Maybe they will because of the unjustice of it.
161 posted on 10/01/2002 6:50:37 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Geeeee ... a smart democrat!!
162 posted on 10/01/2002 6:51:03 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
We need to make a total farce of this. Let's have Forrester drop out and have Tom Selleck stand in for him.

(Surely a technicality like residency is not as important as giving Republicans a more viable choice.)

163 posted on 10/01/2002 6:51:04 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Naw, SCOTUS won't get into a "local" race.

It's more than that. The GOP Appeal goes to the SCOTUS
164 posted on 10/01/2002 6:51:24 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Then I'll need a valium-drip (or a really good defense attorney)
165 posted on 10/01/2002 6:51:49 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I wonder how many Dems can spell Lautenberg correctly :)
166 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:02 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
. She also said the SCOTUS will not take the case. This is a state issue.

I have been pi$$ed since I listened to Hugh Hewitt tonight. He said just that and I fear that is corrct. Now it is down to RICO politics. The fix is in.

167 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:25 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They have just picked a candidate for U.S. Senate BEHIND CLOSED DOORS and without the will of the people of the State of New Jersey.

Yes, I also noticed the similarity between the way that the Dems are operating and the way that the Commies used to operate in the "good old days" of the Soviet Union...

168 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:25 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
OK....you've convinced me.
I won't vote for Lautenberg. : )
169 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:36 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
On Hardball, Clarence Page is saying that for the Democrats to take such a roll of the dice they must KNOW how the SC is going to vote.

And he said that the GOP was going to look bad going in there, even if they were right on the law.

This was planned, calculated...and it's gonna work, IMO. If the court rules against the DNC, the GOP will look like they've won yet another seat through a court ruling.

170 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:38 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Thats their out. If they could pull off this sham, then Lautenberg resigns for health reasons in February, and NJ Guv. appoints another RAT.

I'd almost be willing to bet you just nailed it. Are there any Kennedy's living in NJ?

171 posted on 10/01/2002 6:52:58 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Here's what kills me about this: All of Torch's sleaze was already known and the "new" information wasn't much more specific or much more credible than what we already knew. But while he had the mantle of "incumbent" and polled well, it didn't matter. If the Democrats didn't want him on the ballot, they could have run Lautenberg against him in the primary.
172 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:05 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop
I think the SCOTUS would take the case. This is an equal protection violation, just like Bush v. Gore.
173 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:05 PM PDT by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
dittos.
174 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:07 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: byteback
Well I don't know about the geographic make up of NJ. But if you are talking about South Florida I could certainly make a guess.
175 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:15 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Lautenberg is stumbling and bumbling all over the place in his acceptance speech right now.

Did Lautenberg have a stroke at one time?

176 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:18 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: byteback
The Governor looked like he was guessing on the middle initial. I was afraid he was going to have to buy a vowel.
177 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:19 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
When will the Beast weigh in?
178 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:21 PM PDT by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Naw, SCOTUS won't get into a "local" race.

Can you say "disenfranchised military and absentee voters" or "equal protection?"

179 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:26 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said that by objecting to Torricelli's request, Republicans were "denying the people of New Jersey a choice" in the election.

Once again, Little Tommy has it bass-ackwards! When The Torch decided to run again, there could have been Dems who wanted to run against him, but decided not to spend the money on a losing proposition. So the Dem voters have had to content themselves with the Torch; either they hold their nose and vote for him, vote for Forrester, or don't vote at all. Those are their choices.

By throwing someone in now, they are STILL thwarting the voters. The Dems voters are STILL not going to have any choice in the matter. The powers that be in the Dem party will decide for them. Crap happens sometimes and your party's choice, or the inbumbent of your party is not who you would choose. You can still vote or not, it's up to you, but you still have a choice.

I cannot see how the courts in NJ would allow this!

180 posted on 10/01/2002 6:53:27 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson