Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Goldwater Girl
Ah. I think the thing that confused me, was the part in the law where it stated something like the person who didn't comply had to be removed from the ballot. With the automatic resignation, I guess it would not be possible to actually not comply then and that looks like a useless phrase that could cause some confusion.
88 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:46 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Fuzz
Well, that and the timing of the ruling. (I kind of digressed there)
91 posted on 10/01/2002 6:31:43 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Fuzz
It doesn't say "had to be removed from the ballot"- it says "MAY be removed by a circuit judge".
Judicial oversight is in case of fraud or collusion- not useless or confusing at all. Just not applicable to Katherine Harris.


95 posted on 10/01/2002 6:46:37 PM PDT by Goldwater Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson