Skip to comments.
New Jersey Case Cite RE: What the Democrats Are Trying to Do
www.freerepublic.com
| October 1, 2002
Posted on 10/01/2002 12:27:13 PM PDT by Howlin
New Jersey law already has precedent for such an issue. In Tomasin v. Quinn, 376 A.2d 233 ( N.J. Superior Court, Law Division, 1977), a candidate for county sheriff withdrew, and another man wanted to take his place on the ballot. The court refused.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: floridaredux; ruleoflaw; torricelli; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
To: Sandy
Please see #1 and #9.
121
posted on
10/01/2002 5:30:04 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Dog
I don't know, but I don't think this case is really particularly relevant. This case dealt with a primary election, where the ballot positions of various candidate's individual names are at issue. Ballot positions for general elections are covered by a completely different law. Significantly, when the drawing for position on a general election ballot takes place, it's the political party's names which are drawn, not names of specific nominees. The Dems are looking to change the name of the Dem, not the position of the Dem's name. It's two different things.
122
posted on
10/01/2002 6:28:16 PM PDT
by
Sandy
To: NorCoGOP
Just so you know, Hugh Hewitt not only mentioned this post, he publicly thanked Howlin for posting it. Awesome ping NorCoGOP.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson