Skip to comments.
New Jersey Case Cite RE: What the Democrats Are Trying to Do
www.freerepublic.com
| October 1, 2002
Posted on 10/01/2002 12:27:13 PM PDT by Howlin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Posted for Dog.
1
posted on
10/01/2002 12:27:13 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Dog; hobbes1
FYI.
2
posted on
10/01/2002 12:27:33 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Good post.
To: Howlin
Thanks for posting that. It makes me feel like all we'll have to worry about this election is the "usual" 'Rat antics and election fraud.
To: Howlin
Thank you...
5
posted on
10/01/2002 12:30:11 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Howlin
Please tell me the Repub's know about this to......LOL
To: All
Can someone please see that the media or pundits/talking heads/Rush get a heads up on this? I would, but I don't have direct enough emails or phone nos.
To: Dog; PhiKapMom; deport; Miss Marple; terilyn; justshe; Mo1
You take it from here........I know NOTHING.
8
posted on
10/01/2002 12:32:40 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I posted this for Dog; he found it; post your remarks to him!
9
posted on
10/01/2002 12:33:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Do you know any specifics? How long before the election and why?
To: generalissimoduane
Can you make sure Hugh looks at this .....
11
posted on
10/01/2002 12:34:45 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Howlin
Good work. Glad there's precedent. I've been in a fine stew since yesterday. It was starting to feel this isn't a democracy after all.
12
posted on
10/01/2002 12:34:46 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: Howlin
It's actually in the middle of te article we were at, from NRO, by Dave Kopel...Midway down.
13
posted on
10/01/2002 12:35:11 PM PDT
by
hobbes1
To: Howlin
This is nice, however, none of this matters when the ultimate goal is to retain Democrat power.
To: generalissimoduane; RonDog; doug from upland; JohnHuang2
Ping for Mr. Hewitt's immediate attention...
15
posted on
10/01/2002 12:36:15 PM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
To: Howlin
Your case would not be on point if it involved Republicans. The New Jersy Supreme Court is simply going to ask the State Democratic Committee what it wants and that's how they'll rule. You think Torrecelli is the only one in Jersey who is a crook?
16
posted on
10/01/2002 12:38:49 PM PDT
by
Tacis
To: Howlin
I "googled" this case, and found it among these cases:
Party Switching in NJ--Riecker v. Hartman/supp 22. The court held that without an explicit statutory restriction, and since there are precedents that election laws are to be construed liberally so as to effectuate enfranchisement, a candidate who lost the Republican nomination in the primary, but won the Democratic primary through write-in votes could be placed on the general election ballot in November.
Ballot Position--Tomasin v. Quinn/supp 39. The court denied an application to transfer the position of names on a primary election ballot because the county clerk's discretion to do so was limited by statute which require transfers to take place in a certain manner and time.
Ballot Name--McManus v. Allan/43. The court denied a request to permit the use of another person's name on the ballot for the purposes of party affiliation without the consent of the person as required under NJSA § 19:23-25.
To: Dog
Have the Rats seens this???
Sounds like it might dampen their day
18
posted on
10/01/2002 12:44:27 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: hispanarepublicana; Howlin; hobbes1
Anyone have WESTLAW or Nexus that can search for a case????
The case is:
150 N.J. SUPER 593...
19
posted on
10/01/2002 12:44:45 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Mo1
20
posted on
10/01/2002 12:46:43 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
