Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"I am aware of no cases prior to the New Deal that characterized the power flowing from the Commerce Clause as sweepingly as does our substantial effects test." -- ClarenceThomas

But you, tacticalogic, have produced exactly nothing to show that the CSA is grounded solely in a "substantial effects" argument. The very text of the CSA lays that misrepresentation to rest.

569 posted on 10/03/2002 3:16:11 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
But you, tacticalogic, have produced exactly nothing to show that the CSA is grounded solely in a "substantial effects" argument. The very text of the CSA lays that misrepresentation to rest.

And what exactly, is it grounded in other than "substantial effects", or some rhetorical derivative of it?

571 posted on 10/03/2002 3:26:17 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
THe nitpicking never ends for roscoe. Show!Cite!Support!Refer!Quibble!Split-hairs! - roscoes sophistry will not cease.
573 posted on 10/03/2002 3:36:28 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson