To: tacticalogic
"I am aware of no cases prior to the New Deal that characterized the power flowing from the Commerce Clause as sweepingly as does our substantial effects test." -- ClarenceThomas But you, tacticalogic, have produced exactly nothing to show that the CSA is grounded solely in a "substantial effects" argument. The very text of the CSA lays that misrepresentation to rest.
569 posted on
10/03/2002 3:16:11 PM PDT by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
But you, tacticalogic, have produced exactly nothing to show that the CSA is grounded solely in a "substantial effects" argument. The very text of the CSA lays that misrepresentation to rest.And what exactly, is it grounded in other than "substantial effects", or some rhetorical derivative of it?
To: Roscoe
THe nitpicking never ends for roscoe. Show!Cite!Support!Refer!Quibble!Split-hairs! - roscoes sophistry will not cease.
573 posted on
10/03/2002 3:36:28 PM PDT by
tpaine
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson