[T]here is no plausible scientific mechanism for the origin of life, i.e., the appearance of the first self-replicating biochemical system. The staggeringly high information content of the simplest living thing is not readily explained by evolutionists ...
The major feature of the fossil record is stasis, long periods in which new species do not appear. When new developments occur, they come rapidly, not gradually ...
I find no satisfactory mechanism for macroevolutionary changes. Analogies between a few inches of change in the beaks of a Galapagos finch species and a purported transition from dinosaur to bird (or vice versa) appear to me inappropriate.
Nice contribution. Thank you.
You are welcome. My sister works for Dr. Shaefer, so I have been following his comments on the controversy. His quatam chemistry stuff is over my head, but his editorial made sense to even me.