Because in 1958, your article said that the absence of any pre-Cambrian fossils was a real problem for Darwinism. Since 1958, lots of pre-Cambrian fossils have been found. That's what.
"What a book like Forbidden Archaeology shows, in my view, is that if even a half (or even a tenth) of the objections raised by its authors are valid scientific objections, then Darwinism is a theory that is in deep, irremediable trouble. And the best that Brass can do in the way of rebuttal is to question a handful of their cases as unproven or badly chosen. His preferred method of rebuttal in almost all cases is that described earlier: he simply recites again, more loudly, the accepted Darwinist view."
Totally false. The only multi-cell organism that has been found prior to the Cambrian is a worm. That does not explain the multiplicity of new phyla in the Cambrian. Also, it was after 1958 and the so called 'Vendian" fossils were found that Eldredge and Gould split with Darwinism asserting that Darwinian evolution was rendered bunk by the Cambrian explosion. Also note that Darwin himself stated in the Origins that if no fossils were found prior to the Cambrians his theory would be refuted. Well none have been found to explain the massive sudden flowering of life in the Cambrian so according to Darwin's own statement the theory of evolution has been disproven.