Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnGalt
Oh come on, thats absurd. The "terms of neutrality" certainly do NOT dictate who we may and may not trade with. The terms of sovreignty certainly DO dictate just that. The choice is ours, not ze Germans.

By your logic, the solution to the Chinese trade deficit is justifiable war. Think you'd have Ayn Rand on your side regarding that argument?

WAR IS ONLY AN OPTION WHEN IN RESPONSE TO AN ACT OF FORCE.
208 posted on 10/09/2002 1:28:47 PM PDT by talk2farley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: talk2farley
Spoken like a liberal.

The "terms of neutrality" certainly do NOT dictate who we may and may not trade with. The terms of sovreignty certainly DO dictate just that. The choice is ours, not ze Germans.

I suggest remaining silent and thought a fool rather than posting and removing all doubt...Contraband(munitions for making war), were being sent to the British which violated international laws of neutrality, and by the 1856 Declaration of Paris, made vessels shipping contraband subject to search and seizure and capture. Shipping munitions on passenger vessels put the Germans in a tough spot.

The blockcade of Germany was 'illegal' under The Declaration of London, because it blocked food stuffs from neutrals, however, all the signatories of the DoL had not signed so it was not law per say.

211 posted on 10/09/2002 2:01:27 PM PDT by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson