Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ET(end tyranny)
Pearl Harbor could have been properly warned, and the damages significantly reduced and MANY, MANY lives spared, not to mention saving most of not all of the fleet, but hey, then the people might not have been angered enough to jump into the war.

This is where your argument implodes.

When Pearl Harbor was attacked, the US and Japan were at war, solely by Japan's choice. Are you telling me straight-faced that the US public would NOT have gone to war after the following sequence of events?

Are you SERIOUSLY arguing this point? Are you really saying that after Japan initiated a large string of attacks on US territories and forces, AND the Germans and Italians declared war on the United States, the American public would NOT fight a war?

102 posted on 10/01/2002 2:42:16 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
Pearl Harbor could have been properly warned, and the damages significantly reduced and MANY, MANY lives spared, not to mention saving most of not all of the fleet, but hey, then the people might not have been angered enough to jump into the war.

This is where your argument implodes.

Which part of the above do you disagree with? Are you saying that the same damage and death would have occured even with plenty of warning? Not likely.

What is the timeline for your series of events? Did Pearl Harbor occur first? Had Pearl Harbor not occured but been prevented, perhaps the other events would have been averted as well. What we do KNOW is that Pearl Harbor did NOT have to happen. But, FDR and his cronies made sure that it would.

105 posted on 10/01/2002 2:50:09 PM PDT by ET(end tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson