Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FOX News..GOP Ready Tomorrow With New Jersey Election Lawsuit
FOX News ^ | September 30, 2002 | Linda Vester

Posted on 09/30/2002 12:46:18 PM PDT by tip of the sword

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:48 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Angelwood
Perhaps we should go through our candidates and find the ones that are behind in the polls and have them step down and replace them with winners.

Geez, I despise this people.

41 posted on 09/30/2002 1:01:55 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ER_in_OC,CA
First of all...it is still OUTSIDE the 30-day mark. From the WNBC article earlier, if he resigns the Senate today, then they can run another candidate.

But what if the Torch is majorly pissed at how he himself has been treated by the RATS (basically left to drown), and is saying, "Oh, okay, I'll quit ... on October 7th!"?? That would be INSIDE the 30-day mark, and make things much more interesting.

42 posted on 09/30/2002 1:02:21 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Time to gear up more SCOTUS bashing by the Rats.

The Nazis were pikers in their zeal for power, compared to modern Demoncraps.
43 posted on 09/30/2002 1:02:36 PM PDT by Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
but now daschle can't control te senate right? so maybe republicans can put their bills on the floor right?
44 posted on 09/30/2002 1:02:47 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: swheats
Evidently it didn't bother Daschle that Toricelli was a crook, but it DOES bother Daschle that he's behind in the polls.
45 posted on 09/30/2002 1:02:55 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
And Liz is reporting on her MSNBC thread that the Rats are going to the New Jersey Supreme Court to stop the ballots from being printed.

On what grounds? Nobody's resigned or quit the race yet!

46 posted on 09/30/2002 1:03:17 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
If you are reading this law correctly, then it surely must be unconstitutional. If resignations when down in the polls can get a member of your party appointed for another 1 year or 2 years until a next election, then that could theoretically go on indefinitely.

I personally have no problem with the Torch resigning. He can do that anytime he wishes. If someone else what to run after that announcement, then that's his business. (If I want to start a write-in campaign for myself at this moment, then that's my business and ultimately up to the voters.) The issue is being within the deadline for having a name on the ballot, etc.
47 posted on 09/30/2002 1:04:02 PM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
"Good thing those corrupt slimeball bastards of the NJ GOP did their best to undercut Brett Schundler's campaign. Oh my, how the dynamics would change if Schundler were governor now, instead of McGreevey."

Very VERY good point BUMP!

48 posted on 09/30/2002 1:04:28 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
disinfranchised voters are voters in any election that a Republican wins

disinfranchised voters are democratic voters in any election that a Republican wins

49 posted on 09/30/2002 1:04:57 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
Thanks for the legwork on this. Go ahead, RATs, make our day.
50 posted on 09/30/2002 1:04:59 PM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
The thing that really strikes me is that the Democrats are so willing to "game" the election after hollering that Bush was "politicizing the war."

That is the definition of "no shame."

-PJ

51 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:11 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
Great cite!
52 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:13 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tip of the sword
And I think it will cast a huge dark shadow on the Democrat Party as a whole. This may have ramifications nationwide. Wishful thinking? Maybe.
53 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:26 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
My prediction is that Torch resigns the campaign today and the Senate before the week is out to meet the time deadline and to formulate legal strategy.
54 posted on 09/30/2002 1:05:35 PM PDT by tip of the sword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: writmeister
The thirty-day time limit is for appointing someone to serve the remainder of the term. A separate New Jersey statute prescribes that ballot replacements for general elections must be done 48 days before the election (which has already passed).

Forget about the ballot. If Torch resigns from Senate within 30 days of the election, gov can appoint someone to fill the seat until the next election, presumably two years hence. A complete end-run around the ballot box.

55 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:04 PM PDT by Henk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Angelwood
The DNC has a fundraising concert scheduled on October 9

Is that supposed to be on my dance card?

56 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:20 PM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Exit148
Yup, if little Donnie D had had stones and stood up for Schundler we wouldn't be in this pickle right now. It's Donnie D's fault!
57 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:27 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Looks like writmeister's settled it. There can be no 6-year replacement for the Torch. The election on Nov 5 must be held, whether Torch is on the ballot or not. End of story. All we have to do now is keep the RATS from illegally dumping another name on there.
58 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:54 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Constitutional Patriot
It's pretty obvious that the dems are going to try to throw someone in at the last minute who they think wil have a good chance against Forrester. OR, they might try to pull some B.S. utilizing some obscure law that allows the Governor of the state to get involved. Anyone who thinks that this is a last minute development has a lot to learn.

It IS a late minute desparation move on the part of the rats. Remember that the Torch was given the job of responding the President's radio address a few days ago. Why would they do that if they were planning on dumping him today?

59 posted on 09/30/2002 1:07:19 PM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Then what about appealing to the US Supremes?
60 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:06 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson