Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
It would be a different case: He resigns (within 30 days of the election, but WITHOUT the election having actually taken place) so that a new appointee is pushed in (Bradley, for example) who then stays in office rather than face the actual election .....

It seems to me that one has nothing to do with the other. McGreevey gets to appoint a replacement to serve between now and 1/03. In the meantime, the election goes forward as planned. If the RATs don't get a candidate on the ballot (other than the Torch) tough darts.

703 posted on 09/30/2002 2:03:12 PM PDT by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies ]


To: Torie; Coop
I think RAts got the NJ senate if Da Torch Resigns and McGravy appoints his replacement.....
His replacement will run against Doug...Next Year.....
731 posted on 09/30/2002 2:07:02 PM PDT by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies ]

To: Go Gordon
It seems to me that one has nothing to do with the other. McGreevey gets to appoint a replacement to serve between now and 1/03. In the meantime, the election goes forward as planned. If the RATs don't get a candidate on the ballot (other than the Torch) tough darts.

This seems reasonable to me. How can they force a new election just because they chose to withdraw their candidate? It's like saying: "We're not ready yet! Let's do the election in three months!" Of course, the dims would just as soon overlook that annoying Constition.

988 posted on 09/30/2002 2:27:54 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 703 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson