Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alisasny
From WNBC's website...

"snip"

Reps. Frank Pallone and Robert Menendez, two House members who have long had ambitions for a promotion to the Senate, are among the names being discussed to take Torricelli's place as the Democratic candidate. Another name being floated is that of former Sen. Frank Lautenberg, a Democrat who retired in 2001 after several years of icy relations with Torricelli.

Under New Jersey law, a political party can replace a statewide nominee on the ballot if the person drops out at least 48 days before the election. But only 36 days remain until the Nov. 5 election, meaning Democrats would have to seek approval from the state attorney general. That would likely result in a court challenge from Republicans.

Under state law, if the candidate resigns his office or dies with more than 30 days to the election, the governor can appoint a new candidate. If it happens with less than 30 days before the election, the race can be canceled and the governor can set a new date for a special election.

Mesmells a rat.

43 posted on 09/30/2002 9:37:42 AM PDT by bootyist-monk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bootyist-monk
Mesmells a rat.

NO KIDDING. I cannot believe the Dems will stoop this low. Wait, check that...I can believe it but man, it stinks to high heaven.

54 posted on 09/30/2002 9:40:46 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: bootyist-monk
I think that if they attempt to extend a Jersey term by intentionally vacating a seat and cancelling the election, that would be challenged to the US Supreme Court and disallowed.

The case would be a slam dunk too. Consider if the Supremes allowed it. In such a case, a state could enact a law just like New Jersey's. Then as long as that party kept control of the governorship, they would never have to put the seat up for election- each time the special election would be coming up, the "incumbent" could resign within 30 days of the electin, allowing the governor to cancel the election and appoint a new incumbent. When the next general election would come up, that new incumbent could resign, allowing the governor to cancel the election and appoint a new incumbent. And so on, as long as they maintained control of the governorship.

If the Dems try that gambit, I would bet a lot of money Scalia, Rhenquist, O'Connor, Thomas and Kennedy at a minimum would strike that law down.

67 posted on 09/30/2002 9:43:49 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson