Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Torricelli News Conference 5 pm EST LIVE THREAD

Posted on 09/30/2002 9:20:19 AM PDT by alisasny

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 2,041-2,043 next last
To: LisaFab
This is Vogel on FOX. He is the one who wrote the email advising that Torch must forfeit. He is the General Counsel for the NRSC.

Hey LisaFab! This is a great catch you posted, which Atty. Vogel just reiterated on FoxNews (6:21pm):

September 30, 2002 To: Senator Frist, Mitch Bainwol

From: Alex N. Vogel General Counsel

Re: New Jersey – Ballot Substitution

You have asked for an analysis of New Jersey ballot statutes and regulations regarding a possible vacancy in connection with the upcoming election in New Jersey. New Jersey law explicitly provides that when a vacancy occurs among primary nominees, the state committee of a political party committee may select a replacement candidate. N.J. Stat. § 19:13-20. However, this ballot replacement is only allowed when the vacancy occurs more than 51 days prior to the election. Id. Inside of this 51 day statutory window, a replacement candidate can not be put on the ballot. The only exception ever recognized by a New Jersey court was in the case of the death of a nominee. Petition of Koegh-Dwyer, 106 N.J. Super. 567, 256 A.2d 314 (1969), affirmed 54 N.J. 523, 257 A.2d 697. It is worth noting that the time limit was raised from 34 days to 51 days in 1985. Legislative history from the original statute states that time limit was included "to afford election official sufficient time in which to attend mechanics of preparing for general election." Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 91 A.2d 865 (1952).

1,561 posted on 09/30/2002 3:29:01 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1544 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
If the courts are becoming politicized, then we must do what we can to polticize them in our favor.

The fact is the Dems are trying a "bait and switch" and it will NOT go over well. The Dems are playing with fire, and they might get burned big time on this.
1,562 posted on 09/30/2002 3:29:32 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1538 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
The DemocRATS are starting to remind me of Ted Bundy's last minute desperate attempts to stop his execution
1,563 posted on 09/30/2002 3:30:19 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1551 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
And Hillary does not want Bill stealing her plunder in the Senate.

Exactly! And anyway, they won't succeed in their ploy of getting anyone else's name on the ballot. It just ain't gonna fly.

1,564 posted on 09/30/2002 3:30:19 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1554 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Who would be outraged? Certainly not THEIR voters. They don't care how they win.

Holy Shiite we going to have court cases for the next month, talk about Florida redux.

1,565 posted on 09/30/2002 3:30:29 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1545 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Actually, he has until October 6th to resign; I'm hearing conflicting discussions that it has to be by Saturday but someone said no later than Monday and that X42 could set up residence in NJ and make a run for it. Can you imagine? I haven't felt this familiar knot in my stomach since November 2000.

An expert on Britt Hume's show said the NJ courts would undoubtedly rule in our favor and the only time they reversed an election was due to someone's death -- in this case his 'political death' does not apply.

1,566 posted on 09/30/2002 3:30:50 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1389 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Re#1561 People are stupid, though I don't think that's the plan. I think it is gamble on the courts and then blame, blame, blame the pubbies when they lose. The presstitutes will be willing to play their game, that's for sure...
1,567 posted on 09/30/2002 3:31:29 PM PDT by eureka!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1560 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
If the democRATS had any honor, they'd have forced him to resign once the "ethics committee" wrist-slapped him.
Now they want a "do over".....typical.
1,568 posted on 09/30/2002 3:31:59 PM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
"Whose speech?"

They were repulsed by the Torche's whiny crocodile tear speech...this thead IS moving a tad fast to keep up with, isn't it?

1,569 posted on 09/30/2002 3:32:38 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1460 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Disn't he also say that 1/2 of the ballots had already been sent out....to military, etc.?
1,570 posted on 09/30/2002 3:32:39 PM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Looks like the DemocRATS on another forum are a little scared over this. This is what one had to say...

"Why didn't we throw out the Torch before the 48-day mark and get a new guy? We look like fools! We are destroying our party's credibility."

Problem is, they have always looked like fools. They just never realize it.


1,571 posted on 09/30/2002 3:33:07 PM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The coverage of this is what's disturbing. Much like the 2000 election, where if the situations were reversed, the Republicans would have had zero chance to take the election. McGreedy and Corzine et al act like this is a fait accompli. Our candidate is getting his ass kicked, so let's find a new and circumvent all election laws.

The media, even FNC, seems reluctant to call a spade, a spade.

1,572 posted on 09/30/2002 3:33:24 PM PDT by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1562 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN
Is it possible that he double crossed those that attempted to squeeze him out? Was he suppose to resign today so the governor could appoint a replacement, but he decided to get back at them by not going?

That may well be, but he may yet resign (I think he has till Saturday). It's so hard to predict what unprincipled, immoral people will do.

1,573 posted on 09/30/2002 3:33:27 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1558 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
At this point, just talking about what the Democrats were contemplating should be eye-opening for the nation. It doesn't matter if it plays out or not, the nation should be learning a big lesson from the behavior of Democrats over this. When you add the Democrats in Iraq choosing Hussein over Bush, Daschle's meltdown the other day, and Reno in Florida, you get a strong feeling that perhaps our best interests are not being represented.

-PJ

1,574 posted on 09/30/2002 3:33:31 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies]

To: Carolinamom
Here's my (NIGHTMARE) scenario: The NJDims know they can't change the ballot name, so Bill Clinton moves to NJ and runs TV ads: "You already know my name, now, just right it in!"

Time for a Xanax.

1,575 posted on 09/30/2002 3:34:32 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1570 | View Replies]

To: Wphile; PhiKapMom; cake_crumb; Wait4Truth; afraidfortherepublic; BOBTHENAILER
I dont' know if the 4 is this: but if you're talking about states, Iowa could go to Ganske, the Republican Senate candidate if Harkin's staffer gets immunity and starts talking.

Then, Harkin would be next to resign. But, do they then shut Ganske out in Iowa by using the NJ strategy?

1,576 posted on 09/30/2002 3:34:33 PM PDT by floriduh voter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1505 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
The presstitutes will be willing to play their game, that's for sure...

I'm still waiting to see this. The nakedness of it all is unprecedented.

-PJ

1,577 posted on 09/30/2002 3:34:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1567 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Thanks. I think this makes it clear that the seat is ours although they will try to influence other races by dragging this through the courts, thereby promoting the canard that Pub lawmakers are 'appointed' by courts and not elected by the people.
1,578 posted on 09/30/2002 3:35:23 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1561 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Torie; A Citizen Reporter
That expert on FOX also said that the Torch gave us a gift ....when he said that he was doing this to keep the seat out of Republican hands.....that is now public record and could be used against the RATS in court.
1,579 posted on 09/30/2002 3:35:34 PM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1566 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
They are TRYING to circumvent the law to save that seat. Just like in FLA 2000. These people are unbelievable. And VERY dangerous.

Yes, but notice that they keep screwing up and ultimately failing. The Clinton schemers are gone. The Clinton magic is gone (Hillary : Bill :: Liz Hurley : Bella Abzug). They have nothing left to offer but entitlements, and nothing to strive for except their naked lust for power. The public hsa woken up to this.

1,580 posted on 09/30/2002 3:35:54 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1306 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,541-1,5601,561-1,5801,581-1,600 ... 2,041-2,043 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson