Replies

Actually, the little ingrate decided to put a cool, rebellious, anti-American, Anti-social patch on his jacket to pi$$ people off.

Obviously not, based on the original poster having to inquire what the patch was. It wasn't an invitation; she took it upon herself to find out.

He has know idea what he is standing up for, and she did the right thing and let him know. I don't see how she overreacted to 9-11 by this, this should have been her reaction with or without 9-11.

It has nothing to do w/911, it has everything to do with her histrionics over a non-issue in an inappropriate venue.

She did not start the confrontation, the kid did.

Ted Bundy didn't murder all those women, porn did! He even said so!

The kid has his freedom of speech, he used it, and she has the right to answer back. Her profanity is, IMO, appropriate to the emotions the kid did need to hear.

Again, she came off like a pissy-pants brat, much like she describes the kids. She was on an attitude crusade.

We in the right, have been far too silent for too long, and if 9-11 has changed this then so be it. The 9-11 event should never have been necessary for motivation.

911 is now a turning point in our history. It does not, however, constitute a license to act like an asshole to strangers in public establishments, nor did it before 911.

Some of us believe in manners as well as the Consitution, and it is likely (although I think this entire account is a complete fabrication) that in other circumstances she might have had to have eaten her McMeal with broken teeth.

"she might have had to have eaten her McMeal with broken teeth."

I'll tell you what stud. If ever, and I mean ever, I see any man punch a lady in the mouth, I'll send him to the hospital personally.

Now, about this youngster not bringing it on himself. We've all found out that this "anti-flag" is a band right? So when the lady asked him about it, why didn't he just say it was a band? Why did he have to go off about Americans being wrong on WWI, WWII, Vietnam, ect.? Don't you think he provoked a rebuttal with his answer alone?

Now, whether she should have cussed or not is of her own accord. I probably would have, but that's just me. Freedom of speech goes beyond being able to bash this great nation. It allows cussing too.

Again, she came off like a pissy-pants brat, much like she describes the kids. She was on an attitude crusade.

Pissy-pants brat, huh. Again, she came off like a pissy-pants brat, much like she describes the kids. She was on an attitude crusade.

You are the one with the attitude crusade.

I’m one the “good guys”. I come off pissy because I told one these little ungrateful, anti-American punks off. More people on this thread support my view than you. So if that makes me a pissy-pants brat, so be it. I’m proud to be an American, unlike those three kids.

In addition you honesty think that had I been wearing a swastika on my jean jacket that people wouldn’t confront me? Think about it before you spew anymore of your attitude.

Anti-Flag, she knew what it meant, the kid knew what it meant, she simply challanged it. You know this and I know this.

that in other circumstances she might have had to have eaten her McMeal with broken teeth.

Ok, buddy, time to stand up and be counted. You brought this up, so you can explain it. Do you, or do you not condone this? Do you think she gave provocation for violence? Do you think she would have gotten what she deserved?